Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)

I’m now working on a part of my dissertation with regard to using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a primary method. However, I’m still in need of strengthening the rationale of why I’m choosing CDA as a method to analyze my data (religious narratives). What I want my writer to do is
1) Read those four ECPR MK VMS 2021 pdf files (from Day 1 to Day 4)
2) Read “Chapter 4 Critical discourse analysis, intertextuality/interdiscursivity and the present study (+genre) copy”
3) Read “Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)- in need of further work”

4) When you have a basic sense of what I’m trying to get at in my “Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)- in need of further work” draft, please revise/rewrite/supplement/add what you think is crucial for the development of the discussion drawing upon 1) & 2). That’s why I need an expert on this. I think the current shape of my paper doesn’t sound professional due to a lack of trustworthy citation and literature review from the canonical works in this field.
In this regard, you could attempt to model the “Chapter 4 Critical discourse analysis, intertextuality/interdiscursivity and the present study (+genre) copy” file for your own revision of my doc draft.